October 4th, 2011 LAIGLESFORUM
Left and Right vs. the Banking Oligarchs
Are Americans starting to come together?
by Don Hank
The video linked below provides a glimpse of why we are not a free nation, but also, how we can be free if we play our cards right and at least temporarily stop the artificially induced hostilities between Democrat and Republican voters.
Bill Still explains here how the international bank cartel controls our government, just as they do the rest of the world. You and I, on either side of the political divide, no longer have a say in any major decisions.
Remember the first “bailout” bill (TARP), which was signed by Obama and Bush simultaneously on national TV?
That signing was symbolic of the signing away of our sovereignty by both parties, which actually had happened long before that, as marked by the creation of the Fed in 1913.
I recall it as if it were yesterday, that when the TARP bailout was being discussed, congress reported receiving a record number of phone calls and almost all of the callers (of both parties!) begged their legislators not to sign the bill that charged the public with the disastrous policies of bankers and rewarded them for doing the wrong thing.
Yet, despite this almost overwhelming political pressure from the now-disenfranchised American people, the majority of legislators went ahead and passed the bill, proving that their loyalties were not to you, but to shadowy powers higher up.
Bill Still provides the most plausible reason for that incredible dissonance between what we wanted and what the Banking Oligarchy wanted. The banks control the nation and the world, and the banks in fact control the Fed, not the other way around.
But as Bill also shows, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon. The model for that hope is the State bank of North Dakota, the state with the lowest unemployment and the only State owned bank. It’s not a coincidence.
There is a clue: employment depends on a sound financial and monetary policy.
Here is a brief explanation of the North Dakota state banking system and why it is a model for other states:
And here is a report on the Utah Monetary Declaration, another attempt to break away from slavery to the Fed:
Finally, let me point out something that is absolutely key:
As I have said before, the Oligarchy (Ruling Class) has been able to successfully manipulate the people by cleverly dividing us into two main camps, each with its own vested interests, created by politicians to divert attention from the wizard behind the curtain.
The Republicans created a paradigm to counter the establishment of bank regulations by falsely stating that the banks were part of the free market system and needed “freedom” to operate. If that were actually true, then they would be right, but it was a big lie. As Reagan discovered when he tried deregulation, the banks are guaranteed to a large extent by the Federal government, so they are in some ways immune to failure. That is, a deregulated bank can destroy itself by issuing bad loans, but the government is there to pick up the pieces – by insuring clients at tax payers’ expense. In the Savings and Loans scandal, Reagan had forgotten that fact. He portrayed banks as free market capitalists when in fact they were part of a Private Public Partnership (PPP). So when banks went kaplooey, we the tax payers paid the bill.
So Republicans hate regulations due to a misperception of banks as carriers of sacred capitalism.
On the other hand, Democrats oppose regulations too because they want banks to finance their socialist schemes and this can be best accomplished by unregulated banks in the hands of ideologues dedicated to wealth redistribution – with the proviso that the ideologue bankers get rich implementing it.
By creating and tending these two narratives, the oligarchs have been able to maintain their grip on our finances and money supply.
But now it appears both right and left may be waking up. The treachery isn’t so hard to see now that so many are out of work and people see the huge national debt that will never be paid down.
It was a Democrat president, Andrew Jackson, who broke the backs of the banks, after banking oligarch Nicholas Biddle brazenly threatened to cause a depression, and then did so, showing that the banks would not shrink from deliberately harming the public to get their way – something they have never ceased doing, acting as a shadow government in the so-called Land of the “Free,” and ultimately bringing down the world economy with the cooperation of both political parties in America and of the EU.
Now, ironically, many Americans who really care about the poor and middle class – beyond mere lip service – are aligned with the Tea Party, and their ideas square perfectly with Democrat Andy Jackson’s. Yet thanks to a strong cognitive dissonance syndrome induced by powerful propaganda efforts, Democrat voters have been trained to shun this group. But, equally ironically, many Democrats support the Occupy Wall Street movement, which is based in part on the proposition of freeing the people from the oligarchs (though with the focus, for example, on race instead of the proposition that all Americans are targeted equally by the Ruling Class).
Thus, in their respective ways, both sides seem to have glimpsed a common enemy, and the old taboos against controlling the banks — taboos on the left and differently-motivated ones on the right — are starting to crack.
If the light should ever go on in the minds of We the People of both parties – and there is no reason to assume it can’t, regardless of the propaganda efforts of both sides of Tyranny – then it will be the bankers’ turn to be afraid.
They will have nowhere to hide.
Reprinted with Permission: March 8th, 2011 LAIGLESFORUM
Since 2006, Don Hank has been the owner/operator of the Christian news and views site Laigle’s Forum (http://laiglesforum.com). His straightforward and common-sense articles on politics, economics, science, government and culture have been published in WorldNetDaily, Canada Free Press, Christian Worldview Network, Etherzone, FedUpUSA, Renew America, Desert Conservative and Midia Sem Mascara. His extensive language background leads him to believe that the founders meant what they said in the Constitution, God meant what He said in the Scriptures and the grassroots are the true authorities on natural language, word definitions and the government that is best for them. He is also the founder of Lancaster-York Non-Custodial Parents, a volunteer organization that provided Christian counseling for non-custodial parents.
“The president of the Second Bank, Nicholas Biddle, was quite candid about the power and intention of the bank when he openly threatened to cause a depression if the bank was not re-chartered.”
This day at the eighteenth hour and the 17th minute, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin announced on Mark Levin’s show that she would not be running for President in 2012. The complete transcript of her announcement as published on Mark Levin’s page follows:
October 5, 2011
After much prayer and serious consideration, I have decided that I will not be seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for President of the United States. As always, my family comes first and obviously Todd and I put great consideration into family life before making this decision. When we serve, we devote ourselves to God, family and country. My decision maintains this order.
My decision is based upon a review of what common sense Conservatives and Independents have accomplished, especially over the last year. I believe that at this time I can be more effective in a decisive role to help elect other true public servants to office – from the nation’s governors to Congressional seats and the Presidency. We need to continue to actively and aggressively help those who will stop the “fundamental transformation” of our nation and instead seek the restoration of our greatness, our goodness and our constitutional republic based on the rule of law.
From the bottom of my heart I thank those who have supported me and defended my record throughout the years, and encouraged me to run for President. Know that by working together we can bring this country back – and as I’ve always said, one doesn’t need a title to help do it.
I will continue driving the discussion for freedom and free markets, including in the race for President where our candidates must embrace immediate action toward energy independence through domestic resource developments of conventional energy sources, along with renewables. We must reduce tax burdens and onerous regulations that kill American industry, and our candidates must always push to minimize government to strengthen the economy and allow the private sector to create jobs.
Those will be our priorities so Americans can be confident that a smaller, smarter government that is truly of the people, by the people, and for the people can better serve this most exceptional nation.
In the coming weeks I will help coordinate strategies to assist in replacing the President, re-taking the Senate, and maintaining the House.
Thank you again for all your support. Let’s unite to restore this country!
God bless America.
– Sarah Palin
Barack Obama came into office hoisted by a gushing mainstream media to his lofty, exalted throne formally known as the Presidency of the United States.
Jingoistic slogans, sweet words of “hope,” and chants of “yes we can,” permeated the blogosphere, filled the airways, and joyously leaped from the pages of the print media. Songs of “change we can believe in” filtered and cleansed the socialist filth from his message. The liberal world rejoiced. The Obama campaign pulled their strings, and the puppet media did the song and dance.
Flat, sour notes hit by this media darling, however, went unheard or disregarded in Obama’s political symphony. “Spread the wealth around,” “my idea of Cap and Trade,” “the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties,” and “social justice,” were just a few of his off-key screechings.
Obama found it appalling that the U.S. Constitution says what the state and federal governments cannot do to you but does not say what they must do on your behalf. This, of course, was exactly the framers’ intent; protecting the people from oppressive government like Obama’s redistributive change. Every glimpse into his leftist dogma should have been a harbinger of the looming economic and constitutional crisis on the horizon.
Admonitions about Obama having the most liberal voting record in the Senate, and a radical left-wing economic philosophy went unheeded. Likewise, warnings of his lack of business knowledge and executive experience fell flat. However, he was the left’s candidate of a lifetime and sent a thrill up the collective legs of the media. The progressive, left-wing had their way and their messianic nominee arose to the Presidency, largely because of activist media’s complete failure to vet Barack Obama.
Obama found his soul mates in an ego-stroking, left-wing Congress joined at the ideological hip. They felt entitled to run roughshod over the American people and the fundamental transformation of the Republic was underway. Rants of racism quickly extinguished all dissent.
The poisoned fruit of today’s economic disaster comes from seasons of suffocating weeds of government interference and blocking freedom’s sunshine and nourishment from our free-enterprise system. Barack Obama’s ideology overrides every economic tenet and his failed policies leaves tens-of-millions of Americans without jobs. Long unemployment lines, welfare, and food stamps replace his promise of “hope.”
‘Obama the destroyer’ of jobs and middle-class America now claims the mantle as the warrior for the middle class! If there were a Nobel Prize for pure, chutzpa and arrogance, Barack Obama would be a two-time prizewinner – and deserving of the second. His unconstitutional assault upon the states and people of this country is equaled only by his affront upon their intelligence.
In the final analysis, did this country really choose a man to represent unions at the exclusion of the rest of the nation’s workers and citizens? Did we know creating government jobs would cripple the private sector?
Did we elect a President to oversee our Executive branch of government, overrun with 60’s radicals, Maoists, and far-left extremists, setting policy for the greatest nation on earth?
Did we place a man in the White House to declare war on the states and their citizenry and cause the American people to fear their own government?
Did we vote for a man who rules by executive decree when Congress and the people reject his Marxist ideas?
Did we recognize Obama the “globalist” was intent upon ceding United States power to world organizations and then would repeatedly apologize to them for America’s sins?
After promises of “Obama would be the great uniter,” did we bargain for a President, who deliberately divides the country by race, religion, social status, income, national origin, and wealth? Subsequently, did we foresee the unabashed pandering to each group and driving wedges to foment hatred and distrust?
If history teaches us anything, we should recognize that every despot, dictator, and tyrant in history employed these Obama strategies and tactics. Unfortunately, even for those with masterful knowledge of history, knowledge does not necessarily translate into learning and understanding.
Behind the veils and the facades, when finally we stripped all the trappings and flowery speeches to lay bare the real man, we as a nation were unable to recognize a lightweight man clad in heavyweight demagoguery. The warnings were all there; they all read danger!
Other presidents with illusions of grandeur and duplicitous motives have occupied the White House and each left an indelible stain on the presidency, and weakened the country.
Let us hope that our knowledge of the now unmasked, real Obama will translate into understanding by next November.